![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cork-Dublin, Cork Commuter and occasionally DART and Dublin-Wexford
Posts: 855
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Probably just another false dawn for Kent Station. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Chairman/Publicity
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
|
![]() Looks like Birmingham.
Nice to hear its Carbon-Nuetral. No concrete then? |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 30
|
![]() That looks unspeakably bad, the whole North of England from 1955 - 1990 springs to mind, and not in a good way!
One positive aspect is that the proposed third bridge from the south docklands is shown. On the Cork South Docklands LAP this bridge has been included, it is an addition to the original strategic docklands plan. This bridge is supposed to accommodate buses / Light Rail (as if) connecting the south docklands to this "major new transport hub". It's one small step towards integrated transport, if it's ever built. Does anybody know the contract status of the Midleton line, the weeds appear higher than ever around Carigtowhill. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
New to the board
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 17
|
![]() Is Cork Kent Station not a protected structure! It should be as its one of the finest railway stations in Ireland....
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Ask anyone and they will tell you Cork is one of the worst stations
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
New to the board
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 17
|
![]() While I agree that the station in its current guise the station is not very passenger friendly, the building itself is a fine example of the 19th railway station. While I fully expect that the railway station requires expansion and a major upgrade, I would be very cautious of IE involved in a PPP with a developer where the developer gets to build 000's of apartments and in return builds a railway station as part of the deal for IE. I can guarantee that the railway station would be an uninspiring building which would would age very quickly and passagners expections would fall short.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 826
|
![]() Let's move into the 21st century shall we? Railway stations aren't there to be "nice buildings", they are there to serve the public.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 216
|
![]() They are there to do both! A railway station is a major highlight (or eyesore) in cities and towns across the world, and indeed there is huge importance, in accordance with the accepted policies and laws on protected structures, in maintaining some (but obviously not all) of the existing stations, suitably updated and modernised (or indeed converted into other uses!)
Railway stations are there to serve the travelling public, of course. But Iarnród Éireann/CIÉ, as ordinary developers but also in their capacity as State enterprises, have an additional responsibility to maintain and preserve architectural heritage, and also to build in a way that is appropriate and sustainable...so I think being "nice" is an important factor, although of course it's not the only one... Last edited by packetswitch : 28-08-2007 at 11:50. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern line
Posts: 1,311
|
![]() I would as far as to say thats is true but when a Station like Kent could be a trigger for regeneration of the area, Ceannt too, then it should treated as such.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|