![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sligo Line
Posts: 1,115
|
![]() You can also end up in the ridiculous situation where safety concerns drive up costs or inconvenience people to the extent where they end up travelling by more dangerous means. The overall risk of the journey ends up being higher than it would have been with the original unsafe practices in place.
There is an oft-quoted statistic where more people died in the US after 9-11 in car accidents due to avoiding air travel than actually died in 9-11. On the other hand even with all of the much-vaunted safety practices, Irish Rail have had a few near misses and one in particular where only blind luck prevented massive loss of life. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The real issue is they have had almost a year and a half and to be honest they don't seem to have a clue what they plan to do. Anyway here is the pic.... |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 602
|
![]() Quote:
As Inniskeen states, my understanding was that a barrier wall between the tracks and the cliff face was to be built, but at the moment there is no money to do it and whatever associated trackwork/resignalling would be needed. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
![]() Quote:
How much did the platform extension costs, how much are they wasting on railings which may be more appropriate between the tracks and cliff to stop other falls if they happened Remember it's not as if IE are totally funding it from within their finances... I'm well aware of their financial situation evidenced by 2 other landslide repairs/risks which had to wait until 2015 budget was drawn up as they were to late for 2014's. Last edited by Jamie2k9 : 14-04-2015 at 18:46. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 602
|
![]() Quote:
As to the €1m, we don't know when that money is being made available. With the public sector, it's not as simple as saying we need €x now - the money comes from central government when the funding envelope is available. I suspect that IE are doing what work is affordable at present that maximises flexibility in terms of train lengths. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
![]() Quote:
2.7 million for Cork is an outrageous sum of money for what has being out i place there. One wonders how hard IE tried and if they delivered a costed plan for the works to the Dep of Transport and what they concluded about the stations location which was reviewed last year. Questions, Questions and reluctance of IE to disclose their plans or reasons for not reopening. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 951
|
![]() It wouldn't surprise me if IR had already spent much more than €1m at Waterford re-aligning track and extending platform 5. While the current arrangement is not ideal in that there is no way of crossing up and down Dublin trains south of Ballyhale, it has not proved a major impediment to the very modest pattern of operation at Waterford nowadays. Yes there have been delays on Fridays and yes there is congestion in the evening because Health and Safety considerations have apparently decreed that sets must be cleaned by contractors staff while at the station's only platform. Such personnel are not allowed enter the yard and the powers that be apparently see no issue leaving trains sitting at Waterford West as a consequence - such are the priorities of modern railway operation.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|