![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Regular Poster
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 113
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Coach A
Posts: 188
|
![]() The full force of the law should be enforced without any discretion to these scumbags. Brings back the argument about having transport police within our network.
Getting bail is a joke, incredible. Was it a 22k or 29k set? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sligo Line
Posts: 1,115
|
![]() There are only a few clearly defined reasons for bail being denied. These are that the defendant is likely to abscond while on bail, that the defendant is likely to interfere with witnesses or jurors, that the defendant was already on bail when the crime was committed or that a Garda superintendent believes that the defendant is like to commit another crime while on bail.
The last provision is used relatively rarely but if none of these conditions are met the defendant has to be offered bail. The fact is that prisons are already full of people who have been convicted of crimes. The reality is that to remand somebody who is technically innocent until proven guilty is going to require a convicted criminal to be let out on temporary release to make space. The real issue is about how long it takes the wheels of justice to turn. It will probably be several months before this case comes up and even when it does, if the individuals have no previous record (I won't comment on the likelihood of this), they will probably get away with a short sentence or community service. As somebody who has been up for jury service a couple of times, from my observation the entire process is a bit of a joke and a tremendous waste of a hell of a lot of both peoples time and public money. On the issue of transport police, I can't see that this service would have been assigned any protection as it would have been regarded as a low-risk service. I think it would be more reasonable to expect that there should be a ticket collector on most if not all services to keep an eye on things. This would be especially the case for outer commuter services given that most of the stations have no ticket barriers so the level of fare evasion is sufficient that a ticket collector would be self-financing. I would say personally that I move carriage three or four times a year where there is a particular level of anti-social behaviour going on and I would rather complete my journey in peace and quiet. It wouldn't really occur to me to ring anyone about it as I don't want to get involved and get beaten up or have my laptop smashed for my trouble and there would rarely be any staff on the train to back me up. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Celbridge
Posts: 259
|
![]() I was on the 17.20pm train from Heuston to Portlaoise on Friday evening when two windows were smashed in the carriage by scumbags throwing stones at Clondalkin. Certainly I would prefer to see Transport Police rather than those private security (Brinks) who have only the same powers of arrest as you or I on our transport system.
Last edited by grainne whale : 10-03-2014 at 08:53. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sligo Line
Posts: 1,115
|
![]() It's hard to see what on-board Transport Police can do about stone throwers but I agree that some sort of official staff presence on trains is desirable. As transport police would probably require legislation, this isn't likely to happen.
Stone-throwing is a problem as old as the hills and is by no means unique to Ireland. It was actually a lot worse 20 years ago around Broombridge. Pretty much every train I took back then got hit in Broombridge. Guys going nuts and smashing their way out of carriages on morning commuter services is a new one as far as I can see. Given that the guards have been starved of funds to the point where they can't afford Biros, expecting a timely Garda response might also be a bit unrealistic but both Irish Rail and the guards did seem to do pretty well in their response to events on Friday morning. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Early morning is not a time you would expect trouble
The advent of front/rear CCTV on many trains means the stone throwers can now be traced in many incidents. Legally there is no issue with a transport police as it would be just a gardai division like the traffic corp. The windows are designed to take a pretty significant impact without collapsing, that is no doubt is why the pair on the Longford train didn't get far with the glass hammer. If you know how to use the glass hammer you can take a window out in a single strike, if you don't you will probably break the hammer before you break the window. Just look at the graphic next to the hammer for the secret
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Celbridge
Posts: 259
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by grainne whale : 10-03-2014 at 14:13. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
The problem there is that they are only allowed operate on port/airport property. Transport police would need to be able to operate anywhere on the railway and on roads.
__________________
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Celbridge
Posts: 259
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|