![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#41 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: North Tipperary
Posts: 258
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() Google reveals that name to be a member of Nenagh Rail Partnership.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 951
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 | ||
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 951
|
![]() Originally Posted by Inniskeen
"Is there a big volume of high revenue business at Adamstown then ? As I said there is more than adequate capacity on pre-existing commuter services into Heuston without having to be supplemented by the 0515 from Limerick. Stopping at Hazelhatch and Adamstown also means using the slow line as the platforms serving the fast lines at these stations appear to be mothballed." Quote:
While Irish Rail probably considers this service to be a temporary irritant imposed on them by their paymaster, one would have thought that it would afford an opportunity to improve other services. For example the 0505 from Cork could perhaps have been altered to run non-stop from Ballybrophy to Heuston, with the Limerick via Nenagh service serving Portlaoise and Portarlington only. There is no shortage of capacity at either Hazelhatch or Adamstown and stopping the new service at these stations is both frivilous and unnecessary. Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Roscrea
Posts: 89
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Its been on time once in 5 days, other 4 days delays vary from 5 to 30 minutes
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() If it was decided to convert the direct service to a shuttle using a 2800 set (since the 2700s are going away), is the Cork facing bay platform available in Portlaoise? I don't think it has a platform number in the pictures I've seen. Apart from the track change it would allow that service to stay out of the way of the ex-Portlaoise service.
Last edited by dowlingm : 11-03-2012 at 14:04. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: North Tipperary
Posts: 258
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() Yes, but NTA should hold their meetings in public and accept reasonable deputations, as Metrolinx does in Toronto and Translink does in Vancouver.
http://www.translink.ca/en/About-Us/...d-Reports.aspx http://www.translink.ca/en/Be-Part-of-the-Plan.aspx http://www.metrolinx.com/en/aboutus/..._meetings.aspx http://www.metrolinx.com/en/aboutus/...relations.aspx |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 | |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Cork bay in Portlaoise (Mountmellick bay actually) no longer exists.
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 340
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/finnyus...ream/lightbox/ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cork-Dublin, Cork Commuter and occasionally DART and Dublin-Wexford
Posts: 855
|
![]() Quote:
Rosslare timetable), but that is a political failing that we need to look at separately. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() Without getting into the technicalities more than we have to, would it cost much to reinstate it as a bay to allow a shuttle to drop branch passengers and head back to Limerick as/when convenient? Is there a good reason why they would have opted to forgo the bay with the buffer stops just short of it?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Considering the reversal at Ballybrophy it remains the most logical point of change, plus its 16 miles to Portlaoise a 70 mph train on a soon to be 100mph stretch
The option of a connection into the 05:05 was mentioned to Irish Rail before the service started
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: North Tipperary
Posts: 258
|
![]() In some parts maybe like expenditure but not on the day to day running of services. Pat Rabbitte wouldn't go to the ESB and say reduce your prices or try to change the way Bord Na Mona operates. Alan Kelly should have no power to tell Iarnród Éireann to roll out services to his constituency. You think Iarnród Éireann would have learned from the WRC.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 951
|
![]() Quote:
Ironically Irish Rail have recently spent a small fortune renewing the dis-functional layout at Ballybrophy, the bulk of which is little used. The current arrangement at Portlaoise allows northbound movements along the loop approach the exit signal without requiring the points to be set onto the southbound main line. The bay platform at Portlaoise hasn't been signalled for passenger movements since at least 1976 and has had virtually no function of any sort in recent years. Last edited by Inniskeen : 12-03-2012 at 10:44. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 951
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 395
|
![]() The 0725 ex Portlaoise was on a 3-car today and with the 0600 ex Waterford stuck at Cherryville due to a points failure this meant a very overload train...
Did the other half of the 0725 do the Nenagh run? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|