[Article] Gilmore's Metro stance criticised

dowlingm · 04-10-2010, 01:30

Is building MN official FG policy?

fat controller · 05-10-2010, 21:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by dowlingm

Is building MN official FG policy?

who care's as long as it's built!!!

dowlingm · 06-10-2010, 01:32

my point being that if it was FG policy, it wouldn't be just a couple of north Dublin TDs complaining.

essoII · 09-10-2010, 09:33

Interesting article in todays Independent that points out the costs for M.N. have dropped by a third. I'd be interested to know the sources of their information though.

http://www.independent.ie/national-n...d-2371946.html

Mark Gleeson · 09-10-2010, 12:34

Those numbers are pretty accurate based on what we know and people we have spoken to.

essoII · 09-10-2010, 15:08

That's good to hear Mark.

Ironically, here's a classic Frank McDonald article from today's Irish Times:

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/...280701137.html

I cannot understand this mans logic. He essentially puts down metro north as an outlandish, unrealistic vanity project and then goes to promote this Blue Line bus rapid transit link from no-where to no-where.

The places in-between are already well served by public transport, as are the places it terminates. And he calls it a bargain for €33m?

An example of irrational insanity at its finest, in my opinion.

Ronald Binge · 09-10-2010, 15:49

If BRT is to be used at all it should be on a radial route. This proposal is just crap. Frank wasn't so hot on BRT during the Luas wars.

09-10-2010, 12:34	#5
Mark Gleeson Technical Officer Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Coach C, Seat 33 Posts: 12,669	Those numbers are pretty accurate based on what we know and people we have spoken to. __________________ Unhappy with new timetable - let us know

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

04-10-2010, 01:30	#1
dowlingm Really Really Regluar Poster Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Toronto, Canada Posts: 1,371	Is building MN official FG policy?

06-10-2010, 01:32	#3
dowlingm Really Really Regluar Poster Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Toronto, Canada Posts: 1,371	my point being that if it was FG policy, it wouldn't be just a couple of north Dublin TDs complaining.

09-10-2010, 09:33	#4
essoII Regular Poster Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Co. Wicklow Posts: 124	Interesting article in todays Independent that points out the costs for M.N. have dropped by a third. I'd be interested to know the sources of their information though. http://www.independent.ie/national-n...d-2371946.html

09-10-2010, 15:08	#6
essoII Regular Poster Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Co. Wicklow Posts: 124	That's good to hear Mark. Ironically, here's a classic Frank McDonald article from today's Irish Times: http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/...280701137.html I cannot understand this mans logic. He essentially puts down metro north as an outlandish, unrealistic vanity project and then goes to promote this Blue Line bus rapid transit link from no-where to no-where. The places in-between are already well served by public transport, as are the places it terminates. And he calls it a bargain for €33m? An example of irrational insanity at its finest, in my opinion.

09-10-2010, 15:49	#7
Ronald Binge Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 112	If BRT is to be used at all it should be on a radial route. This proposal is just crap. Frank wasn't so hot on BRT during the Luas wars.