![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/...273706905.html
Quote:
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() The website came online last night
http://www.dartundergroundrailwayorder.ie/ I'd wager that it is impossible to actually read everything included in the time available There is a massive amount of background material provided, including the until now secret Arup report, Dublin Suburban Rail Strategic Review which is eye opening into the vast array of (at times ingenious) possibilities considered
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 340
|
![]() Went for a quick viewing of the documents on display in Pearse today during a break from work. Mark is right, there is a huge amount of documentation on display that would take a commitment to read through fully. Hopefully this bodes well as it shows a lot of effort has been put in by CIE for this to go ahead.
I note though that there seems to be a problem just west of the Inchicore tunnel mouth- the tracks suddenly revert back to 2-tracks. Am I right in saying that the extension of the DART to Hazelhatch is dependent on another railway order expanding the track westward from this area to connect with the 4-track KRP? Having a bottleneck from the end of the KRP to the tunnel mouth can't be the final plan unless DARTs are to terminate in Inchicore. I also believe there is to be a separated-grade connection off the mainline to the tunnel so that Intercity trains can bypass the tunnel and get to Heuston- the railway order doesn't seem to take account of the interaction between traffic for Heuston and traffic to the tunnel. On another note, I was the only person to view the documents today, according to the sign-in sheet. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() West of Inchicore the tunnel tracks drop below the current outbound track and surface in the centre with the current tracks either side. A fly under is proposed with the current outbound track being carried on a bridge to allow the two tunnel tracks to pass under.
By virtue of the design of the Inchicore the station it's slightly below ground level so this arrangement works 4 tracks will be provided between there and Cherry Orchard This is all a separate project.
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know Last edited by Mark Gleeson : 08-07-2010 at 14:20. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 340
|
![]() Is it intended to have that separate project complete in time for the completion of DART Underground?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Subject to funding...
With the move to Inchicore its a lot cheaper and easier to do. Its separate Some of it can be done without planning permission
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
![]() If the link between the 4-track KRP and the Underground is not done properly, then you will have 2 massively expensive projects with a huge reduction in capacity because of a bottleneck junction which will cost much more to rectify at a later date as opposed to doing it as part of what in reality should be one project.
Why is there no joined-up thinking? Reminds me of the city-centre DASH project where the most congested part of the system is neglacted. You couldn't make it up. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() Where are the documents on display? They should be in a public area with no need to sign in.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 340
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|