![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Balbriggan
Posts: 137
|
![]() remember that train well,ppl regularly would jump off.
__________________
Compute the Commute |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Drogheda, Ireland
Posts: 1,275
|
![]() The 20:25 from Pearse to Drogheda (I think it actually starts in Roslare, and is normally a 2600) runs on the wrong tracks through Skerries, and is overtaken by the 20:45. It often has to wait just before Balbriggan for the Enterprise to pass. Skerries would be very easy to 3-track, which could allow most are all non-stopping trains to take to the middle track and pass a stopping one.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() As far as I'm aware the Skerries Balbriggan Dublin bound is reversible
Now if IE could run on time you could do this a lot more but the lack of precision in the times means it doesn't work correctly |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
![]() Increasing the capacity of the Northern Line and enabling it to cope when things go a bit wrong (as they inevitably do) may run into difficulties because 3rd or 4th tracks are very expensive. However by comparison fully banalised signalling all the way to Drogheda, plus a few sets of properly located crossovers should be relatively inexpensive (no heavy civil engineering). I realise that use of the"wrong" road may not be possible in all circumstances, but it should ensure that Enterprises could overtake stopping trains on occasion. It would also make for much easier maintenance, track posession, etc.
Squeezing maximum capacity out of existing lines should be a high priority throughout much of the system. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|