Rail Users Ireland Forum

Go Back   Rail Users Ireland Forum > General Information & Discussion > Events, Happenings and Media
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Unread 05-03-2008, 21:35   #1
Mark Hennessy
Membership Officer
 
Mark Hennessy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maynooth
Posts: 1,116
Default T21 Projects Behind Schedule

http://www.rte.ie/news/2008/0305/transport.html

Quote:

Several transport targets to be missed
Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:43

A new report on the delivery of transport infrastructure has shown that several of the targets for 2008 will be missed.

Construction of the Cork commuter rail service to Midleton will only start in 2009 rather than be completed in 2008.

In Dublin, three Luas projects will also be delayed.
Advertisement

The information was contained in the Department of Transport's second annual progress report on the implementation of the Government's multi-billion investment programme.

11 items were identified as being behind schedule, including the Portlaoise train depot, which was supposed to be completed last year, but will be finished in 2008.

Transport Minister Noel Dempsey said the dates had always been 'indicative' and all but one of the plan's numerous projects would be completed within the designated timeframe of 2015.

He said, in 2007, 82% more was spent on public transport projects than the previous year and Transport 21 is delivering tangible benefits to commuters.

On the positive side, he said 11 national road projects had been completed and construction started on another 10.

Phase one of the Western Rail Corridor had started and new buses had been delivered in Dublin.

Mr Dempsey pointed out that hourly return services on the Cork - Dublin rail route were introduced and new intercity railcars were introduced on the Sligo line.
Mark Hennessy is offline  
Unread 05-03-2008, 22:02   #2
James Shields
Member
 
James Shields's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Drogheda, Ireland
Posts: 1,275
Default

Not rail related, but a sign has gone up on the Samual Becket Bridge (Macken St) Bridge boarding saying it will open in 2010. It was previously to open in 2009 (well, I think it was originally to open in about 2005).
James Shields is offline  
Unread 05-03-2008, 23:24   #3
Coolmine99
New to the board
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the disputed area of Castleknock / Carpenterstown
Posts: 26
Default

It's being designed to take LUAS out to Ringsend, probably in 2121
Coolmine99 is offline  
Unread 05-03-2008, 23:42   #4
Colm Moore
Local Liaison Officer
 
Colm Moore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
Default

Press Release

Transport 21 - Second Annual Progress Report to the Government - 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Shields View Post
Not rail related, but a sign has gone up on the Samual Becket Bridge (Macken St) Bridge boarding saying it will open in 2010. It was previously to open in 2009 (well, I think it was originally to open in about 2005).
Its been on the books since at least 1940.

So was Rathmines swimming pool - that was demolished last month.

Last edited by Colm Moore : 05-03-2008 at 23:59.
Colm Moore is offline  
Unread 06-03-2008, 08:43   #5
Mark Hennessy
Membership Officer
 
Mark Hennessy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maynooth
Posts: 1,116
Default

Tommy Broughan on Morning Ireland this morning bemoned the lack of progress on Cork rail, good to see it actually raised as an issue.

The big ticket items he mentioned for Dublin were Luas extensions and the Metro. No mention of the interconnector.
Mark Hennessy is offline  
Unread 06-03-2008, 09:07   #6
Mark Hennessy
Membership Officer
 
Mark Hennessy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maynooth
Posts: 1,116
Default

Nice graphic from the Indo:



Full story
Mark Hennessy is offline  
Unread 06-03-2008, 10:09   #7
Mark Gleeson
Technical Officer
 
Mark Gleeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
Default

The interconnector is still on time, if in fact running slightly ahead

The rail projects have mainly suffered from planning delays, bear in mind it was taking 9 months roughly to get the ok, under the new SID scheme an Bord Pleanala are getting it done in 6 months, that even with Christmas in the middle which bodes well in the future for the bigger projects

Ennis - Athenry should be running by end 2008 early 2009

Dempsey gave the interconnector a plug last night on the Last Word while Matt Cooper gave him a rather justified hard time

Bear in mind we are still spending 4 times more on roads than on public transport
Mark Gleeson is offline  
Unread 06-03-2008, 10:20   #8
ACustomer
Really Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
Default

It says that the City-Centre re-signalling (DASH) is delated form 2009 to 2011. The delay to this is more like from about 2004 to 2011. Why the endless delays to this? It's hardly a huge project and anything which increases capacity at the most heavily used part of the network should surely be a priority.
ACustomer is offline  
Unread 06-03-2008, 10:29   #9
ThomasJ
Member
 
ThomasJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 2,812
Default

City centre resignalling project
http://www.transport21.ie/PROJECTS/H...g_Project.html

Quote:
Current Status of Project: The project is currently being re-scoped to include the removal of level crossings and the resignalling of the Maynooth line. This is due to the increased demand and growth along the line and in anticipation of the restoration of the Dunboyne Spur. Iarnród Éireann is looking into delivering works on the Maynooth line first, before starting work on the City Centre element. 2011 is expected to be the new completion date for the project.
And towards the bottom of the the progress report press release outling plans for 2008

Quote:
Work will get underway on the Dublin city centre resignalling project which will increase capacity on the city centre and the Maynooth line.

Last edited by ThomasJ : 06-03-2008 at 10:35.
ThomasJ is offline  
Unread 06-03-2008, 10:36   #10
Mark Gleeson
Technical Officer
 
Mark Gleeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
Default

It was promised for 2004 not happening till 2011 ish in reality. Admittedly the signaling between Clonsilla and Connolly is rubbish but still fixing that won't get any more trains through the city

So longer platforms before better signalling - wrong way around
Maynooth line before city centre - wrong way around again
Mark Gleeson is offline  
Unread 06-03-2008, 12:46   #11
eugene
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 132
Default

Is the supposed electrification of the Maynooth line be effected by any of this?
eugene is offline  
Unread 06-03-2008, 13:24   #12
Mark Gleeson
Technical Officer
 
Mark Gleeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
Default

Just to show how quickly things change

On 31 October 2006, CEO IE said work starting 2007 to be complete 2009 on the city centre resignalling
Mark Gleeson is offline  
Unread 06-03-2008, 15:52   #13
clonsilladart
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 65
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Gleeson View Post
It was promised for 2004 not happening till 2011 ish in reality. Admittedly the signaling between Clonsilla and Connolly is rubbish but still fixing that won't get any more trains through the city

So longer platforms before better signalling - wrong way around
Maynooth line before city centre - wrong way around again
What exactly is involved in the signalling project Mark??..... Surly it can't be that difficult to resource and get done. No planning hoops, etc, etc.

Don't want to risk the wrath of starting a "technical discussion", so a nice lay-man's explanation would be great
clonsilladart is offline  
Unread 06-03-2008, 16:02   #14
Mark Gleeson
Technical Officer
 
Mark Gleeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
Default

In really simple terms, they want to rip out the current signalling between Clonsilla and Drumcondra and put in a brand new system allowing more trains to run closer to each other. At least 2 level crossings will be closed, possibly 3 that will mean the signalling can be better spaced. The equipment will all be DART compatible

City Centre works involve some serious works at Grand Canal Dock to get a third platform working

Overall it will mean more trains running closer together at faster speeds, its been on the table since 1999 and nothing has been done

Logically if the city centre is the bottleneck you fix that first as that will be the quickest way to releave the pain on the Maynooth line, more trains now.

This is exceptionally complicated stuff requiring very skilled engineers and has to be done without effecting services.

Far more detailed discription will be up in the members area shortly
Mark Gleeson is offline  
Unread 06-03-2008, 16:56   #15
dowlingm
Really Really Regluar Poster
 
dowlingm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
Default

Mark when you say level crossings will be closed is that likely to be closed outright, replaced with overpasses or is that yet to be decided.

Needless to say the local car-panderering politicians will be wringing their hands despite the improvement to service.
dowlingm is offline  
Unread 06-03-2008, 17:04   #16
Mark Gleeson
Technical Officer
 
Mark Gleeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
Default

That is possibly one of the reasons for slow progress

Remember Transport 21 has all the indications being worked out in the Dáil bar the night before so it was likely to collaspse into itself
Mark Gleeson is offline  
Unread 07-03-2008, 17:30   #17
clonsilladart
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 65
Default

Thanks Mark!!!... like your new Avatar

Seems ludicrous that they are not tackling the bottleneck(s) first. Who makes the prioritisation decisions within IE ..... Bet it's not the Engineers!!!!
clonsilladart is offline  
Unread 07-03-2008, 17:38   #18
Mark Gleeson
Technical Officer
 
Mark Gleeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
Default

They are just as frustrated as we all are with progress, everything is you have the go to complete phase 1 only, no certainty of phase 2 and that goes on all the time

Irish Rail have indicated they want rid of every level crossing in Dublin, how successful they will be in that endeavor is up to the local authorities.

Better signaling, fewer level crossings means faster journeys, more trains and less likelyhood of things going wrong which translates to better more reliable services for passengers
Mark Gleeson is offline  
Unread 07-03-2008, 19:10   #19
dowlingm
Really Really Regluar Poster
 
dowlingm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Gleeson
That is possibly one of the reasons for slow progress
getting rid of the Glanmire Road LC caused fierce ructions on the Midleton process so it wouldn't be surprising at all.
dowlingm is offline  
Unread 07-03-2008, 20:16   #20
James Shields
Member
 
James Shields's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Drogheda, Ireland
Posts: 1,275
Default

Every level crossing? It's hard to see Suutton Cross ever being much of a priority. On the other hand, I can't understand why they don't use the stadium redevelopment as an opportunity to eliminate the Lansdowne Road one.
James Shields is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:24.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.