27-05-2019, 13:31 | #1 | |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
[PR] DART Battery Train Tender Issued
Yes they want to use batteries instead of overhead wires
https://www.nationaltransport.ie/new...sport-history/ Quote:
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
|
27-05-2019, 13:36 | #2 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
The spec which isn't publicly available
Mix of fixed 4 and 8 coach sets of 20-21m coaches 1 toilet per 4 coaches Battery is expected to weigh in at 3.5-4 tons per coach, life span of 10-15 years for battery 100kph on battery, 140kph+ on overhead Range of 50km on battery Immediate need for 500, provision for 100 more in agreement Maynooth line is first in the queue for the trains New depot most likely to go in near Maynooth, this will in time replace Fairview
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
27-05-2019, 14:17 | #3 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cork-Dublin, Cork Commuter and occasionally DART and Dublin-Wexford
Posts: 855
|
So these can operate 50km from the end of the electrified network. And that is effectively 25km each way. And that means 20km each way because you don't risk running to within it's limits.
I know there are plans for further electrification, but that makes them useless on the Kildare and Maynooth lines. On the Connolly-based lines they would get to Skerries or Wicklow. And the PR release says it's future-proofing against the electrification not being completed. |
27-05-2019, 14:34 | #4 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
There is enough to just get to Maynooth and back
BUT here is the stinker you cannot charge while stationary as the overhead wire would melt if you pulled more than about 150amps while stationary. Under full power each 2 coach pulls 500amps so to charge you would need to be able to support much higher currents So you need a charging module to plug in using something other than the pantograph The infrastructure to support this starts to get ugly, the wires are cheaper and simpler And we have been here before, https://www.independent.ie/life/flas...-34252634.html How green is having to dig up several hundred tons of rare earth elements to make the batteries?
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know Last edited by Mark Gleeson : 27-05-2019 at 14:38. |
27-05-2019, 18:24 | #5 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
What is the lead time for having the overhead, substations etc in place and ready for use? Also what about specifications for any new depot or depots? (Let's hope they make a better job of this than was the case for the children's hospital).
With an ever-more urgent need to reduce fossil fuel consumption, what about wider electrification, starting with Dublin-Cork? This should presumably be at 25kv AC from Hazlehatch onwards, which raises the question of dual-voltage EMUs and/or locos. Has any thought or planning been given to this? After all we are supposed to be moving towards electric road vehicles. I would have thought that railways would be comparatively easy to electrify. Is this the responsibility of TII or the NTA? Does Shane Ross take any interest in such major transport issues? |
28-05-2019, 00:17 | #6 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cork-Dublin, Cork Commuter and occasionally DART and Dublin-Wexford
Posts: 855
|
By any stretch, Heuston-Port Laoise should be electrified.
The Cork Area Strategic Plan allows for electrification between Cork and Mallow. At that point you have half of Cork-Dublin electrified anyway. |
28-05-2019, 06:31 | #7 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
Hazelhatch has been set as the boundary, performance on battery would not be sufficient to run on the 160kph 2 track section.
To be honest we need to pull in the commuting situation if you choose to live 20, 30, 40 miles out you will get a fairly basic service. The 1500V DC system remains. However if a long distance electrification was to occur it would be 25KV and if Cork goes electric that is the most likely system. Dual voltage trains particularly at 1500V DC are trivial. The intercity fleet is getting the new hybrid drive and stage 5 engines, for all the talk on emissions rail is already a low emission solution. I've stood next to it, its a great product. I've been on the Siemens CL Eco CityJet, but thats a retro fit not a new train, the battery isn't green really when you consider having to source 4 tons of rare earth metals per coach to make the battery?
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
28-05-2019, 09:04 | #8 | |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sligo Line
Posts: 1,115
|
Quote:
I've been lucky enough to mostly work from home for the last couple of years but most people commuting to Dublin from around me drive already because the train times have deteriorated so badly over the last few years. Nobody living in Longford expects half-hourly service but there is a major need to restore evening journey times to what they were 15 years ago and to provide a later service down in the evening (or at least allow passes to be used on the later buses). |
|
28-05-2019, 09:48 | #9 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Drogheda, Ireland
Posts: 1,275
|
Quote:
People commuting from the outer commuter belt don't expect a magical service every ten minutes, they just want some improvements to make their journey a little less hellish. For example, I think most people would accept some standing time is reasonable at peak times, but on some routes at present you can be standing close to an hour. I think we should be aiming for a maximum standing time of 30 mins, and hopefully closer to 15 mins on most services. |
|
28-05-2019, 10:15 | #10 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Drogheda, Ireland
Posts: 1,275
|
Quote:
The ideal situation would be have a train run Connolly to Bray on overhead power, and arrive back in Connolly (or wherever the overhead lines have got to) with fully charged batteries, ready to head out into the unpowered section. Also, would it make sense to start electrification from the Maynooth and Hazlehatch ends, so the gap is in the middle rather than at the ends? |
|
28-05-2019, 12:38 | #11 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sligo Line
Posts: 1,115
|
I think the issue is that the cable will overheat at the point where it connects with the pantograph if the train is stationary and drawing a lot of current. If the train is in motion, the connection point is in effectively in motion and so the resistive heating is only happening in the one spot for a short amount of time.
This battery idea strikes me as being a bit of a greenwash. At face value, the original idea of bi-mode makes a lot more sense if it's a contingency for delays in electrification. If the electrification is a couple of years late, they'll be ripping out a relatively cheap engine with a year or two to go before overhaul rather than a vastly expensive battery with a decade or more life left in it. Still, at least the 50km range removes the temptation to run high-density commuter units to Sligo. |
28-05-2019, 16:26 | #12 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
I know this sounds a bit nostalgic, but over 80 years ago Prof Drumm's patent battery trains were effectively doing 50km on a full charge. So what's with all this fancy new lithium battery technology?
Also as far as I am aware the Drumm trains used to recharge from a fixed point at Amiens Street, using a pantograph.. The more I think about it the more I fear that bi-modal battery trains will be an excuse for not providing a more comprehensive proper electrification. Also we should not get advice from the UK on electrification projects. They have a cost over-run history worth of the HSE. So for advice go the Spaniards, the Portuguese, the French, or others who have done electrification on fairly lightly trafficked lines which does not appear to cost the earth. |
29-05-2019, 13:55 | #13 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
We have to look at the long term sustainability. Irish Rail is hemorrhaging money due to the need to run these 'thin' commuter routes.
So there needs to be a coherent policy which clearly states there will be no increase in service levels. Set out a service pattern and stick to it. You might be able to justify a train out to Mullingar after 9pm but its sketchy. The whole battery thing is a stop gap, the trains are the longest lead item, no one wants a fleet of trains you cannot use, equally no one wants wires with no trains. The charging is a problem that needs to be worked out, a train draws power when stationary, the lights, heating, AC are all heavy electricity users which uses up a considerable amount of the power budget You cannot really charge while accelerating to to do so would result in trips on the substation at peak hours. You can charge while coasting and braking and a marginal amount while stationary. There is a huge impact on the existing infrastructure which is not scoped with this use in mind. A railway works order is in preparation for the Maynooth line and thats mainly about the level crossings and other supporting works. Irish Rail doesn't want to get into resignaling and electrification until the solution to close all the level crossings is agreed as this has a huge impact on the signaling design and also the overhead wires design. That said you could electrify M3 Parkway/Maynooth to Clonsilla tomorrow without need for any permissions, equally electification out as far as beyond Broombridge looks sensible until you consider the possible works needed at Glasnevin Junc to increase capacity and also the new station to link to Metro.
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know Last edited by Mark Gleeson : 29-05-2019 at 14:15. |
29-05-2019, 21:44 | #14 | |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
Quote:
Heuston side should be fine in theory as fast could be separate and in around Heuston would be more complicated with dual merging but easy to get around. Battery ops and D Undergound would solve most complications. |
|
06-06-2019, 13:08 | #15 | |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
Quote:
|
|
07-06-2019, 15:06 | #16 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
Earlier I referred to the UK electrification fiasco. There is a really good article in Rail Engineer ("Getting Electrification Right") which should be compulsory reading for anyone looking at the future of rail development in Irland: See https://www.railengineer.co.uk/2018/...ication-right/
Earlier I also said go to the Continent rather than the UK for advice. Correction I should have said anywhere but England. From the Rail Engineer article it would seem that the Scots have done things properly, with huge cost savings. |
11-06-2019, 10:46 | #17 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
There will be no selective door opening, it is not needed
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
11-06-2019, 11:07 | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Drogheda, Ireland
Posts: 1,275
|
The feature I would like to see in the spec is automatic wheelchair ramps. I think it's unacceptable that wheelchair users have to phone ahead to arrange to use local transport (and even when they do, there's a good chance the ramp won't appear).
There must be a system that can deploy a ramp at the push of a button? |
12-06-2019, 09:23 | #19 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
This is something being sought
Probably at the first door and the very last door on the train, be a ramp which bridges the gap between the train and the platform edge,
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
12-06-2019, 10:25 | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Drogheda, Ireland
Posts: 1,275
|
I'm guessing that if there isn't a diesel engine under the floor, the floor can be closer to the platform level, so the wheelchair ramp can be less substantial.
Another factor that is important for wheelchair users to use the train without assistance - the location of the wheelchair ramps needs to be predictable (and preferably a wheelchair symbol painted in the right place on the platform). If the wheelchair doors are always the first and last doors, then there's no chance of them getting caught out if the train ends up the wrong way around (though if they don't have the range to get to Wexford, I'm not sure if that can happen). However, if there's one toilet per 4-cars, will it be within reach of the wheelchair ramp doors? Eventually, all trains should be accessible without assistance, but until they are there needs to be some way users can identify which services are from the timetable and website. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|