02-03-2014, 13:58 | #41 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 602
|
Quote:
It's all well and good complaining about the 17:15, but you need to get the train to Longford in place for the early morning service the next day. There will always be some moves on any transport network that, on the face of it, don't make complete sense due to lighter loadings, but that are necessary from a positioning perspective. |
|
02-03-2014, 14:17 | #42 | |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
Quote:
Why how many passengers board the 5.40 daily ex Longford?? Implications of advancing the 06.15 to 06.00 lets say and keep one service? |
|
02-03-2014, 14:30 | #43 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 602
|
But they don't have the same number of trains in service - they're taking Mark 4 sets out of service, so the overall number of trains available is not the same.
|
02-03-2014, 14:45 | #44 | |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
Quote:
Is the M3 Parkway shuttle still 22 in the evenings? |
|
02-03-2014, 15:01 | #45 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 602
|
Quote:
If you are seriously suggesting that they've sets that are designated as being in service (i.e. excluding the sets put into storage for economic reasons) sitting around in sidings doing nothing then really I think you're taking the proverbial. Last edited by berneyarms : 02-03-2014 at 15:06. |
|
02-03-2014, 15:41 | #46 | |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
Quote:
There "could" have a set available to work this service, no excuses. It's just something needs to be done to make it happen. I fully appreciate that the reduction in 4 piece sets than planned may be a factor however it would be easily overcome. 3 coach would be good for the 18.05 but then there is the morning service. It will probably take a complete new timetable until it will be really sorted out but can IE afford to wait months for this and keep some customers in the process? Last edited by Jamie2k9 : 02-03-2014 at 15:53. |
|
02-03-2014, 15:58 | #47 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 602
|
Quote:
|
|
03-03-2014, 09:32 | #48 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
This morning (MArch 3) the Irish Rail home page says that the closure between Carrick on Shannon and Longford is continuing. However the Twitter updates say that the line is now re-opening.
The Homepage information is dated February 28th. The laziness and incompetence in keeping such apparently outdated and misleading material is simply beyond belief |
03-03-2014, 09:56 | #49 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sligo Line
Posts: 1,115
|
It's all updated now, although still dated February 28th. I would generally assume that a twitter feed will be more up-to-date than a website, but this should be more in-sync. This has been such a mess. I cannot believe that they had updated the timetable on the journey planner but didn't bother telling anybody.
Edgeworthstown station has managed to do a notice using a handwritten sheet of A4 sellotaped to the door with updates managed using Tippex. |
03-03-2014, 18:23 | #50 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sligo Line
Posts: 1,115
|
Well people are staying away in droves today. I'm on the 1705 and I count 12 people in this car after Mullingar. Hopefully it won't take too long to go back to pre-disruption levels.
|
03-03-2014, 23:37 | #51 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
To be fair the line reopened after the morning peak so commuters had already had a plan to get home without the train.
Tomorrow morning will be the acid test
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|