[Letters] Coping with the big freeze / Rebuilding the rail network

[dowlingm]

Oops.

Madam, – Upon my return from a brief visit to London recently I was reminded of a distinct advantage that cities, such as London, have over our capital city. In times when ice-cold temperatures make surface-level road transport virtually grind to a halt, the London Underground rail system ensures that the business of the region continues. This cold reality offers something very instructive to Dublin. It says we need to build Metro North, Metro West, the Dart Underground and make a start in London’s direction. – Yours, etc, JOHN B REID,
Knapton Road,
Dún Laoghaire,
Co Dublin.

Someone should let this guy in on the realities of the Western Rail Canal too

Madam, – Being among the last of the 180 people who donated blood in the Claremorris clinic last Wednesday evening, I happened to meet the driver who was bringing these donations back to Dublin on a near impassible N60.
Should weather conditions worsen, railways will be the only way to get these life-saving supplies to the patients in counties Dublin, Louth and Carlow, where supplies had come under pressure due to the inclement weather.
Keynesian economics argued that in times like these, government should invest in infrastructure and particularly capital intensive infrastructure projects. I welcome the rebuilding of the Western Rail Corridor. For more reasons than ever, the rebuilding of this railway between Limerick, Galway, Mayo and Sligo must be a priority, together with Athlone-Mullingar, Dublin-Clonsilla and any other railway line that remains intact in Ireland today.
Creating thousands of jobs, boosting tourism, helping students and commuters, and saving lives seems like very solid economics to me. – Yours, etc,
MICHAEL KEAN,
Ashford Court,
Claremorris,
Co Mayo.

[Thomas J Stamp]

lunacy and ill informed rubbish.

[Traincustomer]

In what way may I ask is this ill informed and lunacy, these points on the whole seem quite valid to me.

[dermo88]

The first one is broadly correct. The second.....

is talking of 180 people in a town of 2,500 people. Many people are ill informed as to the realities of rail transport, and that it works effectively where there are high population densities. The weather conditions we have are hardly justification for restoring the rail network on the likes of Athenry to Claremorris.

[Mark Gleeson]

Metro West as highlighted is a high questionable project, be nice but no one really has been able to explain why it works, the first letter is broadly in line with policy, though the motivation might be placing a little too much confidence in the system

5 days of fairly pathetic snow does not make a business case to open a rail line, the WRC crowd are getting ever more desperate. Its not as if the rail system worked perfectly during the cold patch, trains were failing all over the place.

What we need to move forward is a solid case based on repeat daily business - paying commuters, not once off events, grannies on free travel etc.

[dowlingm]

cavanrailbus
1. MetroWest won't be underground - clearly the letter writer never bothered to find that out.
2. IE's poor response to the weather - frozen points, cancelled services, railcars DOA - will have convinced nobody that it is a valid alternative to the roads this winter.

[plant43]

Originally Posted by dowlingm

cavanrailbus

2. IE's poor response to the weather - frozen points, cancelled services, railcars DOA - will have convinced nobody that it is a valid alternative to the roads this winter.

They may have had failures, but they didn't completely withdraw service like Dublin Bus did.

[zag]

Originally Posted by Mark Gleeson

What we need to move forward is a solid case based on repeat daily business - paying commuters, not once off events, grannies on free travel etc.

Last I heard, grannies on free travel were passengers too. Or does RUI only represent fare paying passengers who travel every day ? From a profitability point of view fare paying passengers are very important, without a doubt. Since when was RUI concerned with the profitability of the service instead of the the service level ?

z

[Mark Gleeson]

What we what is a rail service which works, you cannot build a business case for new lines on grannies (who pay in real terms less than 60% of market value) the numbers are not there nor is the business regular. Nor can it be built on once off events.

You need a stable dependable patronage to drive the timetable, growth in passenger numbers => more trains. The service cannot operate with a knife hanging over it. Unless the business case can support 7+ trains a day each way there is no point as below that the frequency is unless for daily commuters

The WRC is a blackhole in money terms and will lose multiple millions per annum, has no business case and will result in later rail projects being delayed and cancelled as what little confidence exists at government level will be lost. In real terms the WRC will cost 15-20 times more per passenger than the Dublin Suburban network, its very existence is already drawing resources away leading to current passengers suffering.

Just remember when you are wedged into a 4 coach commuter train in Dublin, there will be a 2 car railcar with less than a half dozen passengers disturbing the sheep on the WRC I don't call that fair nor is it sensible business and it certainly is not in the interest of those we represent, the passengers. There are no passengers on the WRC last time I checked.

Any expansion of the network cannot come at the price of services being reduced elsewhere