Rail Users Ireland Forum

Go Back   Rail Users Ireland Forum > Irish Rail Customer Service Issues > Intercity and Regional
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Unread 09-08-2011, 11:30   #1
SESRSF
New to the board
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
Default Iarnrod Eireann's Plans to Save Ailing Lines

As some of you may have heard, Coras Iompair Eireann has set about considering the Parry People Mover as a possible saviour of the following; Waterford - Limerick, Limerick - Nenagh, and even Rosslare - Waterford.

Is this Irish Rail trying to appear to be for the poeple? Will the units survive 20 years of being thrashed up and down the lines? Will more of the infrastructure have to be ripped out to make it more viable? Views please.
SESRSF is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-08-2011, 12:03   #2
Mark Gleeson
Technical Officer
 
Mark Gleeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
Default

Irish Rail is actually engaging in a blocking strategy to prevent others with a real interest from coming forward. They have entertained all kinds of crazy proposals including a plan to electrify the route (not joking)

The NTA has confirmed that there is no subsidy for the route so Irish Rail is effectively locked out. Any restoration with subsidy would require a public tender

There are three international rail/transport companies interested in running a real service with real trains. I have personally spoken with managers in two in the last 10 days one involved flying to ******* to review one of there current operations.

Irish Rail is legally blocked from ripping the track up on Rosslare Waterford by both the actually lines owners and also by the NTA

The simplest problem with the Parry People mover lark is its not big enough to cope with demand, 50+ passengers were routine on the route before closure. I've seen it take 3 large mini buses to replace a Waterford Limerick Junction train (all seats taken on all buses)

Last edited by Mark Gleeson : 09-08-2011 at 12:07.
Mark Gleeson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-08-2011, 12:36   #3
Thomas Ralph
IT Officer
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Greenwich, London
Posts: 1,860
Default

Maybe they should buy a few rakes of Pacers from over here
Thomas Ralph is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-08-2011, 13:10   #4
SESRSF
New to the board
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
Default

Well, I'd say no, the Pacers aren't DDA complant, and they're to be replaced with the older D78 Stock once they have left from the District Line. Lord only knows what their official designation will be.

I know that Tanya has been involved in the talks, as well as your good self Mark. But, what I am led to believe is that they will propose to have a prototype 2-car PPM100 built for the lines, with perhaps the PPM60 in use on the line to Nenagh.

I'd assume that perhaps Go-Ahead, or Arriva wold be interested in running rail services over that route. From experience, I'd say that Pacers are worse than the Parrys, and D78 stock probably better than both.

But then, D78 Stock is more Metro North than Tipperary North.

Any users of the Waterford - Limerick line on here? If so, do more than 100 people use the train any one time?
SESRSF is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-08-2011, 13:10   #5
Thomas Ralph
IT Officer
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Greenwich, London
Posts: 1,860
Default

Thankfully, the DDA is a UK law and does not apply in Ireland.
Thomas Ralph is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-08-2011, 13:19   #6
SESRSF
New to the board
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
Default

Oh OK, I thought it applied to all of Europe now.
SESRSF is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-08-2011, 13:28   #7
Mark Gleeson
Technical Officer
 
Mark Gleeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SESRSF View Post
I'd assume that perhaps Go-Ahead, or Arriva wold be interested in running rail services over that route. From experience,
Neither Go-Ahead, or Arriva are currently interested in operating in Ireland and I have never spoken with them there are others

I have a unique view on pacers which the RUI committee will know but we will be spared this thankfully. Irish Rail is subject to requirement via the DoT and NTA to ensure all new trains meet the UK DDA/RVAR and EU TSI's on accessibility

The problem is that you can't have a lightweight tram/train on a mainline and the Rosslare-Waterford-Limerick Junction line still is a mainline with trains of up to 1000 tons at times at reasonable speeds. Unlike the UK trials where the line is isolated from the mainline there is shared running at all points on the route and the last thing we want is to block potential through passenger and freight
Mark Gleeson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-08-2011, 13:36   #8
SESRSF
New to the board
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
Default

Yes there's a point, especially dangerous when you consider the crossing at Limerick Junction. Where small tram/trains are at risk of being sideswiped at 100MPH, in a worst-case scenario kind of incident.

Also, yes it will be of disruption to pretty much everyone else.

But, the Pacers are to go in favour of older, slower rolling stock in Britain, so any company would be very desperate indeed to get 80's rolling stock being replaced by 70's rolling stock.

Also, the regauging of Paces would much harder than doing it Sprinters for example, because of the affixed wheelsets on the pacers.
SESRSF is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-08-2011, 20:06   #9
ThomasJ
Member
 
ThomasJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 2,812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas Ralph View Post
Maybe they should buy a few rakes of Pacers from over here
They could do the job

(by the way little off topic side note hope all is okay out your way!)
ThomasJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-08-2011, 20:09   #10
Thomas Ralph
IT Officer
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Greenwich, London
Posts: 1,860
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThomasJ View Post
(by the way little off topic side note hope all is okay out your way!)
I'm fine; few local stations, bars, shops etc burnt out.
Thomas Ralph is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-08-2011, 20:13   #11
ThomasJ
Member
 
ThomasJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 2,812
Default

Thats good!

Dont worry theyll soon get bored!

I feel for the people who have lost property etc.
ThomasJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-08-2011, 12:08   #12
Mark Gleeson
Technical Officer
 
Mark Gleeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
Default

2751 and 2753 are allowed out on there own

53 seats, accessible toilet and bike rack

There was concern in the past that they would not trigger track circuits correctly so they now have a magic box under the floor to deal with that.

Cost wise there isn't much in savings really, in the case of Waterford Rosslare the allocation of costs was actually fair and did not allocate the train maintenance costs to the line
Mark Gleeson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 14-08-2011, 18:45   #13
dowlingm
Really Really Regluar Poster
 
dowlingm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
Default

The amount of money spent on the Nenagh track (and still being spent) is going to cause a lot of disquiet if it is to be closed. Problem is, now it seems the bridges are in need of remedials too!
dowlingm is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-08-2011, 14:35   #14
Traincustomer
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: ar an traein
Posts: 600
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SESRSF View Post
As some of you may have heard, Coras Iompair Eireann has set about considering the Parry People Mover as a possible saviour of the following; Waterford - Limerick, Limerick - Nenagh, and even Rosslare - Waterford.

Is this Irish Rail trying to appear to be for the poeple? Will the units survive 20 years of being thrashed up and down the lines? Will more of the infrastructure have to be ripped out to make it more viable? Views please.
Hi, have noticed that you only mention "Limerick-Nenagh" - I guess this means Nenagh-Roscrea-Ballybrophy would, even under such plans, be closed?

My main concern here (and this is no reflection in any way on the formidable work towards restoring/retaining services being done) is that prospective operators would be “put off” by this apparent blocking strategy. I’m confident that they are robust companies but over time things can wear even the best down. Like many others I’d like to see Rosslare-Waterford restored and Limerick Junction-Waterford and Ballybrophy-Limerick retained. My preference would be to see a new operator/s. It would be awful that this current strong potential to restore and retain services would dissipate to the point where, for instance two years down the line there would be “no hope whatsoever” of anything.

Another thought is if they really want to Irish Rail may well find enough money from somewhere to reinstate the service without subsidy.

Last edited by Traincustomer : 09-08-2011 at 15:02. Reason: addition of content
Traincustomer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-08-2011, 14:58   #15
jacko
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Traincustomer View Post
Hi, have noticed that you only mention "Limerick-Nenagh" - I guess this means Nenagh-Roscrea-Ballybrophy would, even under such plans, be closed?
cant see it closing especially with local TD Alan Kelly now minister for public transport
jacko is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-08-2011, 15:31   #16
SESRSF
New to the board
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
Default

That's the thing, IE may close that section because of many people having made alternative arrangments already, such as people going to Ballybrophy from Roscrea, instead of Roscrea itself.

You never know though, but the Colm McCarthy report is threatening that there's no hope whatever way you cut it.

Let's just maintain high hopes for now, I'm sure that with some kind of Community Rail Partnership, something can be worked out.

I will see to it that CIE get a full and frank e-mail - Don't wait with baited breath for a response though.
SESRSF is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-08-2011, 15:44   #17
Mark Gleeson
Technical Officer
 
Mark Gleeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
Default

The Nenagh line is the weakest link in the system currently as it is horrifically
uncompetitive in journey times.

I'd put money on it being next in the line for the axe
Mark Gleeson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-08-2011, 16:08   #18
comcor
Really Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cork-Dublin, Cork Commuter and occasionally DART and Dublin-Wexford
Posts: 855
Default

And unlike Limerick-Waterford, which could be seen as being of strategic importance because it links two largeish cities, the Limerick-Nenagh-Ballybrophy line links two towns to the network that are the same size as many others that got disconnected over the years - Youghal, New Ross, Bandon, Tuam, Macroom, Cavan, Monaghan etc.

Although I can't quite see it going while Kelly is the Minister in charge.
comcor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:27.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.