View Single Post
Unread 30-01-2007, 11:35   #10
Gobdaw
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 54
Default

The fact that the metal portion of the viaduct is not the original must lessen the value of its status as a listed structure, and replication of the steel in the original position on the bridge supports would, as suggested, allow the bridge be again doubled ( or with a design cantelevered off the masonry structure, possibly trebbled).

What improvements to train paths etc would doubling allow?
Gobdaw is offline   Reply With Quote