View Single Post
Unread 03-01-2008, 13:22   #10
plant43
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 278
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by karman View Post
It's all very well to say that people who live within a km of the station are lazy for driving and should be walking, but this doesn't take into account:

1. The climate... it's hardly mediterranean! I for one do not like arriving at / sitting in work all day in a damp suit or have a damp rain suit hanging up in a small office.

2. The quality of roads, footpaths & street lighting around many outlying stations leaves a lot to be desired. I have had cars come uncomfortably close to me on the narrow road down to Louisa Bridge station... this does not encourage me to walk.

3. Other tasks achieved on the way to the station such as dropping kids to creche or school.

I may be missing the point here, but I think paying €5 pw for a car park is infintely preferable to parking on a muddy verge on a poorly lit road. People are voting with their feet...or their wheels when they are too lazy to use their feet ... the car park at Louisa Bridge is almost always full by 9 a.m. on a weekday.
1. The number of days when you're washed out is minimal. I cycle every day and the number of days I'm rained on is actually not that great.

2. Funding should be diverted from improving car parks to improving pedestrian access to train station.

3. And so the vicous cycle continues. Children are growing up thinking that the only way to travel short distances is to drive. Back in my day (and it's not even that long ago) we walked 30 minutes to school and we liked it. Children can be brought to school on foot (or on bike, quite an impressive range of accessories for that these days).

It can entirely be put down to laziness.
plant43 is offline   Reply With Quote